Thirty-two months into the current employment expansion, New Jersey’s private-sector employers are moving through one of the weakest periods of job growth in more than half a century, the New Jersey Business & Industry Association said in an analysis of employment data provided by the NJ Department of Labor.

In the first 11 months of 2005, New Jersey’s private-sector employers added just 31,400 jobs. At this rate of growth, New Jersey can expect to add only slightly more private-sector jobs in 2005 than it added in 2004, which was 31,300, a gain of about 1 percent. This is below the rate of private-sector employment growth for the nation as a whole. It is also well below the rate of comparable job growth in New Jersey during the previous two economic expansions in the 1980s and 1990s. (See Chart 1)

Commenting on the State’s employment growth, NJBIA President Philip Kirschner said this is disappointing news for the New Jersey economy. He noted, “We are seeing sluggish job growth in an already shallow employment recovery.”

Since hitting a cyclical low in March 2003, private-sector employment in New Jersey has grown by 79,200 new jobs. This works out to an average annual gain of less than 29,700 jobs, less than half of the annual growth of nearly 67,000 private-sector jobs in the 1990s expansion and less than a third of nearly 100,000 jobs created annually in the 1980s boom.

Because employment growth has been so weak, New Jersey’s private-sector hasn’t yet recouped all of the jobs lost in the 2001-2002 recession. As of October, employment was still 7,200 jobs shy of the peak of 3.43 million jobs achieved in December 2000, the month before the recession began. (See Table 1)

New Jersey also has not kept pace with the nation.

The US economy created more than 2 million private-sector jobs last year, an increase of nearly 2 percent, making 2004 a breakout year for the nation as a whole. By contrast, New Jersey created only 31,300 private-sector jobs in 2004, a gain of barely 1 percent. This placed the Garden State 41st in the nation in its rate of growth.

Commenting on this data, Rutgers University economists James Hughes and Joe Seneca noted in their July 2005 Rutgers Regional Report that New Jersey’s 2002-2005 expansion “has demonstrated unprecedented weakness.” And they urged the State to put a renewed focus on policies that would encourage private-sector job growth.

“The State is no longer one of the leaders in employment growth; instead, it lags the nation,” Hughes and Seneca wrote.

Even when compared to its historical employment growth trend, New Jersey is performing poorly. Since World War II, employment in New Jersey has grown by an average of about 40,000 new jobs a year, an average that includes both up and down years.

“The bottom line is that the current expansion has had…the weakest private-sector employment growth of any expansion in the post-World War II era,” Hughes and Seneca noted in their report.

The current employment weakness is even more pronounced when compared to the two previous expansions. Between 1993 and 2000, New Jersey’s private sector employers added an average of 66,600 new jobs every year. The average annual gain in the 1980s, an exceptional period of growth, was closer to 100,000.

Underlying the state’s weak employment growth are a number of factors, among them: 1) a struggling manufacturing sector that has lost more than 98,400 jobs since December 2000, 2) a weak rate of employment growth in the normally robust service industries, and 3) exceptionally weak growth in high-paying service industries that accounted for much of the State’s growth in the 1990s.

Manufacturing

The biggest factor behind New Jersey’s disappointing job-growth performance in recent years has been the slide in manufacturing jobs. Over the last five years, nearly a quarter of all manufacturing jobs in this state have disappeared.

Specifically, between December 2000 (the start of the recession) and November 2005, total manufacturing employment fell by 98,400 jobs, falling to 323,600 from 422,000, a decline of 23 percent. (See Chart 2)

The losses were especially acute in 2001, when 40,000 positions vanished. In the two years that followed, the losses moderated, but were still significant, with a decline of 23,600 jobs in 2002 and 14,000 in 2003.

A reprieve of sorts followed in 2004 with a loss of only 7,300 manufacturing jobs. Hopes that this reprieve would carry into 2005 did not materialize. The first 11 months of 2005 brought a loss of 13,400 jobs.

New Jersey’s manufacturing employment losses have been nearly universal, affecting every major industry group. Between 2000 and 2004, all major groups except pharmaceuticals sustained losses of between 8 percent (chemicals) and 48 percent (apparel). (See Table 2) Pharmaceuticals (a subcategory of chemicals) managed a small gain of 1,600 jobs over the period, up 4 percent.

The driving force behind these losses is the exceptionally high cost of doing business in New Jersey as compared to the rest of the country. High costs make it very difficult for New Jersey manufacturers to compete with low-cost competitors in other states and countries. Some of those costs include exploding health insurance premiums, rising energy prices, high taxes and environmental compliance.

Service Sector

But manufacturing alone is not to blame for New Jersey’s weak employment picture. In the private sector, poorly performing service industries have also contributed to sub-par growth.

The service sector was the workhorse of New Jersey’s robust 1992-2000 economic expansion, powering the bulk of the employment gains in that period. The 1990s expansion produced an average of 66,600 private service jobs annually. Just as importantly, the bulk of those service-sector jobs were in high-paying positions in financial, business and professional services.

But in the current expansion, the service sector is a powerhouse no longer—not in the number of jobs it has produced nor in the quality of those jobs.

In 2003 and 2004, the State’s private service-producing industries created a total of 48,200 new jobs. (The main service industries are financial, business and professional, education and health, and leisure and hospitality.) This produced an annual gain of 24,100, a mere one-third of the sector’s average annual gain of 67,700 in the 1990s.

Just as worrisome in the current expansion are the types of new service jobs being created. In an article entitled “Hamburger Flippers Come on Strong,” Hughes and Seneca point out that most of the gains in the service sector are coming from lower-paying jobs in retail, education and health, and leisure and hospitality. Far fewer jobs are being created in the high-paying financial and business and professional services industries—the very same industries that provided the bulk of new services jobs in the 1990s. (See Table 1)

The economists point out that “lagging growth in these high-paying sectors has been particularly hard on the State’s office markets.” Among other things, this means that vacancy rates in Class A office buildings are still hovering around 25 percent, which is, according to Hughes and Seneca, one of the highest rates in the country.

They conclude in another report that while Corporate America might not be abandoning New Jersey, “it appears to be concentrating its expansion outside of the State’s borders.” They wrote that this “may well be signaling a loss of economic competitiveness” for New Jersey.

Conclusion

The current rate of private-sector job growth in New Jersey is one of the slowest in the country. A big loss of manufacturing jobs and a slow recovery in many of the State’s higher-paying service sectors combined to place New Jersey 41st in the nation in its rate of private-sector employment growth last year.

In the first 11 months of this year, New Jersey created only 31,400 private-sector jobs, which puts the State on track to add only slightly more jobs in 2005 than it did in 2004.

The current slow rate of job growth is in sharp contrast to the two previous expansion cycles. The 1990s produced nearly 67,000 new private sector jobs annually, and the 1980s, closer to 100,000.

Two of New Jersey’s leading regional economists, Hughes and Seneca of Rutgers University, warn that the current weak performance may signal “a loss of economic competitiveness in New Jersey” as companies look to other states to expand their operations.

	Return to News Center